News in English

Americans will need ‘a real Marine Corps’ in order to fight a 2-front war

WND 
A U.S. Marine Corps AH-1Z Viper attached to 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit dispenses flares while conducting threat counter tactics training over the Pacific Ocean on Thursday, Aug. 1, 2024. (U.S. Marine Corps photo)

The term “axis of evil” (AOE) originally coined by President George W Bush in response to the attacks on September 11th, 2001, included adversarial foreign governments that sponsored terrorism and sought weapons of mass destruction, namely Iran, Iraq, and North Korea. Certainly not a Warsaw Pact-like organization. However, today’s axis of evil may come closer to threatening the U.S. with a multi-front war, a war we are not ready for.

The new AOE, if it exists, consists of China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia. US intelligence suggests there are plans afoot to coordinate any Chinese attack against Taiwan, East China Sea or South China Sea with military action elsewhere. The most likely candidate is Iran. Russia is otherwise engaged, and North Koreas is not ready to engage in a major regional conflict (MRC),

Until 2019, the United States was reasonably well positioned to wage a two-front war, The theory was win-hold-win, Win in the major theater (in this case China). Hold in the secondary theater (Iran here); then win in MRC 2.

The key to the two MRC strategy was the United States Marine Corps. The Marine Corps had several capabilities vital to the second MRC.

The Marine Corps previously had a rapid reaction air-alert capability that could put a light infantry force on the ground within twenty-four hours. This, combined with army light infantry, (82d Airborne, 101st Air Assault, and 10th Mountain divisions). These elements would act as a tripwire to discourage the adversary from crossing the line of departure or as a blocking force on the brink of hostilities.

The real Marine Corps contribution would come with the arrival of a Marine Corps Expeditionary Unit with a small, but potent combined arms team replete with armor, artillery, aviation, and assault engineers. In the Iran example it would be the MEU stationed 24/7 in the Persian Gulf/Indian Ocean region. Next would come a full combined arms capability in the form of a Maritime Pre-positioned Marine Expeditionary Brigade (MPS) with a full complement of tanks, artillery, combat aircraft, and assault engineers.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!

In the Iranian case (second MRC), the MPS set stationed at Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean would be used. As needed, the other two MPS sets could be added to make up a full division/ air wing/ logistics team or corps- sized Marine Expeditionary force. If needed additional divisions, and air wings could reinforce the MEF as needed. This was exactly what happened in Desert Shield/Storm and Iraqi Freedom, but that capability no longer exists.

U.S. Marines graduate recruit training aboard Marine Corps Recruit Depot Parris Island South Carolina, March 26, 2021.(U.S. Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. Samuel Fletcher)

Inexplicably, starting in 2019, the Marine Corps transformed itself from a robust combined arms team into a combination of light infantry and coastal artillery.

Even if the Marine Corps had retained the combat capabilities lost through divestment, it would have been crippled by the failure of the Navy’s amphibious shipbuilding deals made for the Marine Corps.

These divestments were made to allow the Marine Corps to implement its poorly conceived first island chain, China-centric Force Design concept that has the Corps buying anti-ship missiles for use in a blue water fight that will likely never happen.

Most naval and geopolitical experts are appalled by the concept and the resulting loss of combined arms capabilities. A recent report by the Center for Naval Analysis (CNA) bemoans the loss of that combined arms combat power. This is particularly disturbing because CNA is the FFRDC* think tank designated to support the Marine Corps.

Like the retired general officers who generally advise the senior active leadership, CNA was apparently cut out of the process.  Wargaming supporting Force Design minimized the lack of logistical support and the viability of platforms such as the landing ship medium. MCCDC (Marine Corps Combat Development Command), responsible for the development of future operational concepts was also absent from Force Design planning.

The Former Commandant and his team that rushed Force Design into development overlooked or willfully disregarded the nation’s capability to fight and win two MRCs. Legendary Marine Corps hero “Chesty Puller” was fond of saying that “the road to Hell is paved with the good intentions of Second Lieutenants,” now the same can probably be said for Four Star Generals.

* FFRDC – Federally funded research and development center.


Gary Anderson retired as Chief of Staff of the Marine Corps Warfighting Lab.

This article was originally published by RealClearDefense and made available via RealClearWire.

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!

Читайте на 123ru.net