How Criminal Networks Launder Money Out of the United States

Each year, an extraordinary volume of illicit money quietly exits the United States, flowing through financial institutions, businesses, charities, trade channels, and digital platforms with remarkable efficiency. Estimates from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime indicate that between 2 and 5 percent of global GDP is laundered annually, amounting to roughly 800 billion to 2 trillion U.S. dollars. The United States plays a central role in this system, not merely as a destination for illicit proceeds, but as a critical transit and exit point for criminal wealth moving overseas.

According to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, hundreds of billions of dollars in illicit proceeds linked to narcotics trafficking, fraud, corruption, and cybercrime pass through or exit the American financial system every year. The Department of Homeland Security has repeatedly identified the United States as a prime laundering target due to its stable banking sector, high transaction volume, deep capital markets, and historically permissive corporate formation environment. These strengths of the U.S. economy are precisely what sophisticated criminal networks seek to exploit.

Understanding how criminals move money out of the United States requires more than a focus on individual transactions. It requires examining who controls these networks, how settlement mechanisms operate, which jurisdictions are exploited, and why these schemes persist despite decades of federal oversight. The evidence shows that laundering is not an afterthought to crime. It is a core operational function that enables criminal and terrorist organizations to survive, expand, and shield leadership from accountability.

Why Criminals Move Illicit Funds Overseas

Money laundering exists to disguise the origins of illegally obtained funds and integrate them into the legitimate economy. Moving money out of the United States serves several strategic purposes. It reduces exposure to U.S. law enforcement, exploits jurisdictions with weaker regulatory controls, facilitates reinvestment in overseas criminal or terrorist operations, and places assets in environments where seizure and repatriation are slow or politically constrained.

The Financial Action Task Force has consistently found that criminals gravitate toward systems offering anonymity, limited transparency, and weak beneficial ownership requirements. Academic research on transnational crime confirms that cross-border transfers reduce seizure risk and allow networks to diversify financial exposure across multiple jurisdictions. Once funds leave the United States, they are often layered through additional transactions that further obscure ownership and origin.

Who Launders Money Out of the United States

The actors involved extend far beyond stereotypical traffickers or street-level criminals. Laundering networks include drug cartels, cybercrime syndicates, fraud rings, sanctions evaders, and corrupt foreign officials. Equally important are professional enablers such as attorneys, accountants, corporate service providers, trade intermediaries, and money services operators who design and maintain laundering structures.

The Department of Justice has emphasized that modern laundering is rarely conducted by individuals acting alone. Instead, it relies on multi-layered operations in which specialized facilitators provide services that disguise ownership, generate documentation, manage settlement, and exploit regulatory blind spots. These actors often operate at the intersection of legal commerce and criminal finance, making detection and prosecution more complex.

Where the Money Goes

Illicit American funds commonly flow to jurisdictions with lenient incorporation laws, weak supervision of financial institutions, or limited cooperation with U.S. authorities. These destinations include parts of the Caribbean, Central America, Europe, the Gulf region, and East Asia. Transfers occur through formal banking channels, informal value systems, trade transactions, and increasingly through digital platforms and cryptocurrencies.

Timing also matters. Laundering activity often intensifies around high-revenue criminal cycles, including narcotics distribution surges, major fraud schemes, or ransomware campaigns. The global nature of these flows means that enforcement gaps in one jurisdiction can undermine controls elsewhere.

Six Verified Methods Used to Launder Money Out of the United States

Criminals do not rely on a single playbook. They constantly adapt, refine, and invent new methods to stay ahead of law enforcement. The following mechanisms represent the most common and proven ways illicit American money is moved overseas by exploiting legal, financial, and regulatory vulnerabilities within the United States and the global financial system.

1. Hawala and Informal Value Transfer Systems

Hawala and similar informal value transfer systems move money through trust-based broker networks rather than formal banks. Because no physical funds cross borders through regulated financial institutions, these systems are difficult to trace and often evade reporting requirements.

A significant U.S. prosecution occurred in 2012, when federal authorities charged Mohammad Younis, a Virginia-based hawala operator, with running an unlicensed money transmitting business that moved large sums overseas. Customers delivered cash to Younis in the United States, and he instructed foreign counterparts to release equivalent funds abroad. Investigators documented transfers linked to recipients in Pakistan and the Middle East, including funds tied to tax fraud and other criminal activity.

Federal prosecutors emphasized that informal transfer systems allow criminals to export value from the United States without triggering Suspicious Activity Reports or cross-border wire scrutiny. Despite repeated enforcement actions, hawala networks remain resilient because they are embedded in legitimate community and commercial relationships.

2. Abuse of Nonprofits, Charities, and Religious Donations

The exploitation of nonprofit organizations and charities remains one of the most effective and difficult-to-detect methods of moving illicit money overseas. By operating under the cover of humanitarian or religious activity, these entities can legitimize transfers that would otherwise attract scrutiny.

The most prominent example is the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, once the largest Muslim charity in the United States. Federal prosecutors proved that between 1995 and 2001, the organization funneled at least 12.4 million dollars to Hamas-controlled entities through Zakat committees in the West Bank and Gaza. Although some funds supported humanitarian projects, the courts determined that the ultimate beneficiaries were institutions controlled by a designated terrorist organization, constituting material support for terrorism under U.S. law.

A similar pattern emerged with the Benevolence International Foundation, whose U.S. offices were raided in 2001. Investigators uncovered financial and logistical support for al-Qaeda operatives, including links to weapons, travel facilitation, and forged documents. These cases established that charitable structures can function as financial and operational platforms for extremist networks when oversight is weak or deliberately circumvented.

More recently, U.S. Treasury actions have shown how designated groups exploit digital payment systems and fragile foreign banking environments to continue receiving funds from diaspora communities, demonstrating that nonprofit abuse continues to evolve alongside technology.

3. Shell Companies and Professional Enablers

Shell companies remain a cornerstone of international money laundering. Anonymous entities registered in U.S. states with minimal disclosure requirements have historically allowed criminals to move millions of dollars through the American financial system before sending funds overseas disguised as legitimate business expenses.

In 2020, the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations documented how anonymous companies registered in states such as Delaware and Nevada were used by foreign and domestic criminals to receive illicit funds and wire them abroad. In several cases, shell entities with no employees or real operations served as conduits for fraud proceeds routed through U.S. banks to foreign accounts.

Professional enablers play a decisive role in these schemes. By leveraging legal credentials and corporate expertise, they provide credibility to transactions that might otherwise raise red flags. These structures undermine financial transparency and complicate efforts to identify beneficial ownership, a vulnerability the Corporate Transparency Act seeks to address.

4. Trade-Based Money Laundering

Trade-based money laundering moves value across borders by manipulating invoices, shipment values, and trade documentation. This method exploits the sheer volume and complexity of international trade, where false pricing can be difficult to detect.

U.S. authorities uncovered a major network tied to the Sinaloa Cartel that used Los Angeles-based clothing exporters to launder drug proceeds through the Black Market Peso Exchange. Drug cash was delivered to U.S. businesses, deposited into bank accounts, and used to purchase goods exported to Latin America at falsified prices. The scheme converted narcotics proceeds into trade revenue while avoiding direct international cash transfers.

Trade-based laundering remains particularly challenging because it intersects with legitimate commerce and relies on documentation that appears routine to banks and customs authorities.

5. Bulk Cash Smuggling

Despite advances in digital finance, bulk cash smuggling remains a primary method for moving illicit funds out of the United States. Criminal organizations continue to rely on physical currency because it bypasses formal financial oversight.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection regularly seizes large sums concealed in vehicles and cargo headed toward Mexico and other destinations. These seizures, which collectively amount to hundreds of millions of dollars annually, represent only a fraction of the true volume smuggled. The persistence of this method underscores the enduring role of cash in narcotics trafficking and other illicit enterprises.

6. Digital Transfers and Cryptocurrency Laundering

Cryptocurrency has transformed cross-border laundering by allowing value to move internationally within minutes. In 2021, the Department of Justice charged Roman Sterlingov for operating Bitcoin Fog, a cryptocurrency mixer that laundered more than 335 million dollars linked to narcotics trafficking and cybercrime. By obscuring transaction trails, mixers make it difficult for investigators to trace the origin of funds.

In another landmark case, federal authorities arrested Ilya Lichtenstein and Heather Morgan in 2022 for laundering approximately 4.5 billion dollars in cryptocurrency stolen during the Bitfinex hack. The case illustrated how criminals exploit foreign exchanges, weak compliance controls, and digital payment instruments to move value out of U.S. jurisdiction.

Federal agencies warn that crypto-based laundering is becoming a dominant tool for cybercriminals targeting American victims, with implications for financial integrity and national security.

Why This Matters

Money laundering out of the United States is not a peripheral financial crime. It is a structural enabler of organized crime, terrorism, sanctions evasion, and foreign influence operations. Federal prosecutions and Treasury assessments show that laundering functions as a force multiplier, allowing illicit enterprises to scale, endure, and regenerate.

The most important insight from decades of enforcement is that laundering is overwhelmingly conducted by organized, service-based networks rather than isolated individuals. These networks sell laundering as a service, engineering concealment and settlement for the world’s most dangerous actors. As long as this infrastructure remains intact, criminal organizations will continue to adapt faster than enforcement efforts.

Effective countermeasures must therefore focus on dismantling the systems that make illicit finance repeatable and scalable, not merely seizing assets after the fact. Treating money laundering as a core national security threat, rather than a technical compliance issue, is essential to protecting the integrity of the U.S. financial system.

---

Check out all the great things Small Wars Journal has to offer.

The post How Criminal Networks Launder Money Out of the United States appeared first on Small Wars Journal by Arizona State University.